Do People in Canada Have Too Much Freedom to Say and Do Whatever They Want?

Published: 2021-07-05
661 words
3 pages
6 min to read
letter-mark
B
letter
University/College: 
Carnegie Mellon University
Type of paper: 
Research paper
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

The right and privilege to communicate your thoughts and shape your opinion is the significant fundamental component of democracy. Freedom of expression is a central aspect of the right to contradict and a fundamental component of self-improvement. In Canada, people do not have much freedom to say and do whatever they want, however, there are some mixed reactions, and some people argue that some people in the society are mostly favored in the society based on their social status and their religious status. The following research paper is dedicated to analyzing the major issues surrounding the freedom of speech in Canada, and the firmly discuss how freedom of speech is constrained in Canada.

The Freedom of speech in Canada is safeguarded as a "fundamental freedom" by the Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Furthermore, the freedom of speech that is in Canada is neither absolute; according to the Section 1 of the charters, the government is granted the power that permits them with the jurisdiction to enact laws that regulate the free expression, provided that the limitations are sensible and can be advocated in a free and democratic society ("Constitution Acts, 1867 To 1982"). This will regularly be the center of contention since others would consider the circumstances for rational justification as indefinite, conceding the government a farcical measure of constraint over the freedom of speech. Some believe that kind of limitations are essential so as to adjust the essential freedoms of one party against that of the others and as far as possible restrict the political violence as well as the tyranny of the majority. Loathe speech, (which alludes to the support and prompting of genocide or their identifiable group), and profanity is two examples that earned critical consideration from the public discourse and media (Barendt 55).

In the book by Taylor, Lisa, and Cara-Marie, it is contended that restriction together with the regulation, constrain the medias freedom of speech, and then they are an unrestrained and not "free" environment (p.14). The restriction can be viewed as both motivation and motive to the execution of the particular behavior, attitudes, expressions, and how general public chooses to agree to categorize its structure of social system control. Critics argue that we got a lot to worry from the economic sets that possess the influence to control the media through advertisements and ownership that the states itself. The body of Mass media of communication stopped reflecting the thoughts in the society; instead, they are the section of a class structure (Taylor, Lisa, and Cara-Marie 76).

According to the online article by Vespa, the M-103 was passed recently by the parliament it was reached that; the House of Commons rebukes Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination. The law gives people, especially Muslims to have the freedom to express their opinion based on their religious facts; however, some people view it as an act of restricting the freedom of expression. Iqra Khaled had, with his interest in proposing the motion, wanted people in Canada to have equal rights regardless of their religious status; however, the law does not give the Muslim much privilege on the Freedom of Speech.

Decisively, the people in Canada are not granted with a lot of freedom of speech, given that their right of expression is being regulated by Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the law is always revised to ensure that the people dont have a lot of power to express their sentiments which might raise political crisis or lead to civil contention.

Works Cited

"Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982". Laws-Lois.Justice.Gc. Ca, 2017, http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-15.html.

Barendt, Eric. Freedom of speech. Oxford University Press, 2005.

Taylor, Lisa, and Cara-Marie OHagan. The Unfulfilled Promise of Press Freedom in Canada. University of Toronto Press, 2017.

Vespa, Matt. "Does the Canadian Motion Condemning Islamophobia Put Free Speech in The Crosshairs? 30 Percent of Canadians Think So". Town hall, 2017, https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/03/25/does-the-canadian-motion-condemning-islamophobia-put-free-speech-in-the-crosshairs-30-percent-of-canadians-think-so-n2303981.

Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the customtermpaperwriting.org website, please click below to request its removal: