Paper Example on Tobacco Use

Any frequent use of the tobacco plant, its products and Leafs are termed as the tobacco use. Tobacco can be used in different ways; they can either be smoked or smokeless. The smoked tobacco may be in the following forms cigarettes, pipes, and cigars (Nelson, et al., 1995, p. 35). The level of tobacco ph. in cigars and the pine is very high their nicotine is observed in the oral cavity while the nicotine in a cigarette are more acidic and can only be observed in the lungs. The smokeless one includes the product which can either be sniffed chewed or sucked. This type of tobacco use is associated with increased risk for cancer affecting the oral body system ("Smoking and Health in the Americas," 1992). Smokeless tobacco may also have the following effects gum diseases, nicotine addition, gum recession tooth loss, tooth decay and high blood pressure.

The blood pressure may result in fatal stroke; the United States government achieved this information in two different types of research aiming at identifying some of the risk factors associated with the use of smokeless (Torrens, 1995, p. 51). The growth portion of the marketplace on the internet is termed to be facilitated by many provided that the effort in the internet marketing has facilitated this growth. The latest smokeless tobacco is known as the Snus, this product is rapidly expanding in the market, and it has attracted a lot of users, they are becoming addicts. Asus is a product that coexists with cigarette smokers who continue to smoke where they can. They will use the product in all their places.one will not replace the other where the smoking is prohibited.

The International Response to the Proliferation of Smokeless Tobacco

Assessing the magnitude of the effects of tobacco in a global context is complex because chemicals of the products that forms it vary to a large extent. Another reason for complexity in assessing its magnitude globally is due to its difference in use in different countries across the world (Goel & Nelson, 2009). The nicotine and volatility of nitrosamines content in the Smokeless Tobacco are far much different in concentration from one country to another. There is need to assess the persistent barriers that are likely to remain as a result of novelty wearing off.

According to the Global submit, regulating the Smokeless Tobacco should start right from implementing laws that are consistent with the international laws from the national level. The FCT is establishing international laws that are of great focus on the Tobacco issue where those laws are unprecedented (Fisher & Roget, 2009). All the countries, governments and bodies that are capable of controlling the smokeless tobacco right from their production to consumption are compelled by the set international laws to be vigilant because they are abided by the law given knowledge of such ignoring the tobacco within their control.

Another response from international bodies governing is that the international laws should regulate the world trade organizations ("Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF)," 2012). According to this response, the prohibition of barriers against smokeless tobacco is discriminated by other nations, a factor that increases their supply in those countries. Such a legislation needs to be effected through dividing the commonly affected countries into categories which will ensure full implementation of such laws governing the regulation of smokeless tobacco.

The Relevance Regulatory Measures for Tobacco Consumption

Tobacco smoking is one of the most significant inevitable sources of ill health and premature mortality globally. In the 20th century, about 100 million people who died were seen to have been caused by smoking of tobacco (Carney, 2016, p. 14). There are approximately one billion smokers of tobacco globally, and worldwide tobacco use is rising with epidemic fluctuation to the developing world. Dependence of tobacco is a serious situation which regularly needs frequent intervention for the accomplishment. It is no enough to inform the patients about the risks of health for them to change using tobacco (Goel & Nelson, 2009). Tobacco smokers should be given enough counseling when they want to leave smoking tobacco. Pharmacologic smoking cessation services are endorsed for all the tobacco smokers who want to leave smoking, not unless contraindicated (Goel & Nelson, 2009). In the US there are evidence-based strategies which burn nicotine replacement therapy, SR bupropion, and varenicline as an active substitute for the cessation of smoking rehabilitation, mostly when it is combined with the interactive interventions.

The United States of America is trying to regulate the use of tobacco by the citizens, especially the youth following the adverse effect that they have on both health and social context. For it to make such regulations, the state employs regulatory policies that restrict the availability of such drugs in the users environments ("Smoking and Health in the Americas," 1992). Therefore, the laws and policies employed include policies of marketing, state legislations and the policies, laws regarding tobacco and regulatory means and the state versus native regulatory policies.

The federal laws and policies that are used by the state have the main agenda of restricting the use of tobacco through strict measures that affect all the parties involved in the supply of tobacco. The first aim that the federal policies seek is to protect people before they start using tobacco to avoid them (Redhead, Burrows, & Library of Congress, 2009). Commonly, once a person, especially the youth start to use tobacco, there is the likelihood that they will be addicted and quitting it becomes difficult. Another agenda of the federal laws and policies is to provide measures that help the addict in the society to quit using tobacco (Redhead, Burrows, & Library of Congress, 2009). Mainly, the state starts by using smokeless tobacco such as e-cigarette as a connotation means. In case there is no possibility of the group of an addict to quit using tobacco, the federal state seeks to manage the harmful effects caused by tobacco.

Controlling tobacco is important in reducing diseases, disabilities, and health issues related to usage of tobacco. The government, therefore, has a responsibility to use a all-inclusive approach that includes educational means, medical means, economic and the social means to ensure that these tragedies are avoided by its people (Rakel & Houston, 2012). Moreover, the United States of America employs many regulatory measures that seek to inflict an understanding about the impacts that both smokeless and tobacco-related drugs have in their lives.

There are many states laws, regulations and the lawful covenants which control the advertisements of tobacco and tobacco products marketing. In the year 1998, a master settlement agreement was signed by Attorneys generals of forty-six states together with the leading companies of tobacco in United State. The Federal governments have additional conditions which are applied to advertisement and promoting tobacco products (Rakel & Houston, 2012). Later the agreement was signed by other forty tobacco companies. In regards to these agreements, the operating companies dealing with tobacco are bounded by the following:

Covenants in paying the state million dollars yearly to reimburse the cost of health cost in regards to tobacco.

Permission on the advertisements of tobacco which targets youths under 18 years of age together with the use of caricatures

Outdoor limitations, billboard, and public passage advertisement

Permission on the usage of the tobacco brand names on other products

Provisions of inside documents to the companies dealing with tobacco to the public.

The United States of America have implemented many laws that govern the use of the tobacco. The federal government and the state governments of United States have endorsed laws that prohibit smoking in the public and work places ("WHO | Recommendation on smokeless tobacco products," 2017). These laws are known as the smoke-free air laws. The government is utilizing all means possible to discourage the use of tobacco. Among them is the continuous increase of taxes that are imposed on the tobacco products in the United States. The aim of this is to increase the cost of the cigarette, discourage and reduce the number cigarette an individual is smoking per day. The government of the United States has also tried their best in ensuring that the Medicaids treatment covers are provided for the tobacco users, this will ensure that the tobacco users felt the quilt by improving the affordability of the cessation strategies ("Smoking and Health in the Americas," 1992). The government has also existed all the possible ways in ensuring that the laws that prohibit that prohibit the sale of the flavored tobacco products.

Different states in the United States of America have device separate control programs that regulate the use of the tobacco in the different states; the programs help states to plan and establish the best control program, the program also facilitates in the budgeting of the different states concerning the methods of reducing the tobacco addiction and use. CDC program ensures that there are the community and state intervention ("Smoking and Health in the Americas," 1992). The different control programs ensure that the reduction and control of the tobacco use are gradual, these programs include the following: community transformation grants, national tobacco control program, geographic health equity alliance, national Africa America tobacco prevention network and the national behavioral health network for tobacco and cancer control ("Shisha and other types of tobacco | Cancer Research UK," 2017). The main role of these programs is to ensure that they all target in the possible ways of reducing the tobacco use and creating awareness among the users about the use of the harmful plant and its possible consequences, the program aims at specific sub-groups that have high case in the use of tobacco.

Promotion of E-Cigarettes

Electronic cigarette refers to devices that battery powers to vaporize a liquid solution which users inhale. Inhalation of electronic cigarette is called vaping because the liquid content in it has been vaporized (Stimpson & Smith, 2015). The solution inside this inhalants usually has nicotine content which is flavored differently to suit different needs of the consumers. The e-cigarette has been preferred to smoking because it does not contain smoke which renders users to be vulnerable to many health issues such as cancer (Quelch, Gale, Quisic (Firm), ACT, Inc, & Insight Media (Firm), 2005). The health impacts of e-cigarette on health are difficult to evaluate despite the knowledge that it offers less exposure to toxic chemicals compared to conventional cigarettes.

The research is done pertaining how the e-cigarette is an effective method of smoking cessation has not been fully explored. However, the likelihood of this cigarette to enable quitting smoking is high because its chemical content is limited to the only small concentration of nicotine (Quelch, Gale, Quisic (Firm), ACT, Inc, & Insight Media (Firm), 2005). Therefore, the marketing of this form of cigarette has grown much-making manufacturers to use various marketing tools including websites, social media, and televisions. According to the research done by the Nicotine and Tobacco Foundation in the US in 2014, e-cigarette took the lead being the most circulated product compared to its tobacco counterparts products.

One of the critical research website, the San Francisco center for tobacco, and 95 % of the people who were interviewed gave different form...