Paper Example on Fight for Equality in Gender

Gender bias is a multifaceted issue, which spans in all the cultures and countries. The world has become a better place as compared to the 20th century. The changes can be seen in different areas including progress in medicine, spread of literacy and education,  free exchange of communication, greater voice of women in the public areas, and the way women issues have gained high prominence in the development platform (Scott, Crompton, & Lyonette, 2010). The great prominence has been obtained with intense reaction to AIDs epidemic, female genital mutilation, dowry deaths, and exploitation of the women sex workers. The contexts of leadership including the expectation and perception of the followers have significant influences on how leadership is conducted by both the genders. However, the current theories of leadership have omitted the discussion of feminist values, study of genders, and the principles of diversity. Although most of the women have contributed research and essays on the servant leadership and articles there is still a gap in literature regarding the issue of addressing feminist issues and perspectives of gender in the servant leadership (Barreto, Ryan, & Schmitt, 2009).

Most of the women worldwide still earn less as compared to the men in most of the countries. In the current economy, several citizens are pinching and stretching their pennies, and the women are given a disadvantage due to the wide gap (Chow, 2003). Research shows that approximately women work for about 59 days free on a yearly basis. Although the women being less as compared to their male counterparts attribute this gap, it is significant to address the other factors, which contribute to the wide gap. The policies that are set most of the firms are not friendly to the women for the women rearing children and having families. Thus, this issue makes the women look for alternate career paths that are flexible.

Gender bias and differences

Both women and men endeavor to accomplish a work and family adjusts. However, this does not infer pretty much balance. Additionally, the steadiness of gender and class disparities negate the thought that lives are ending up noticeably more individualized. Driving universal experts record how gender orientation imbalances are changing and the number of variations of prior times are being destroyed (Appelbaum, Audet, & Miller, 2003). Therefore, it is important to analyze the contentions between various sorts of feminisms, reexamine old open deliberations about "equity" and "distinction" in the gendered way of work and mind, and propose new and creative approach arrangements.

Even in the 21st century, inequality persists in most of the regions. There is no developing region where the women enjoy equal rights with the men. In some areas, the women lack the rights-owning a land or conducting business. Furthermore, the issue of gender bias has raised the female mortality rates in some parts (Trinidad, & Normore, 2005). The women who run the enterprises are less capitalized as compared to the ones run by the men. Although there is an increase in the educational attainment of the women, there is still a large gap between the genders (Scott, Crompton, & Lyonette, 2010). Additionally, the women are underrepresented in all the levels of the government.

Regarding education, the female secondary and primary enrollments rates and the years of the female schooling have increased in this 21st century. The gaps between the male and females who are educated is becoming lower as education is becoming an essential foundation that helps in developing flexible skills that assist in the participation of knowledge-intensive economic activity (Appelbaum, Audet, & Miller, 2003). Concerning the issue of health, the women tend to live longer as compared to the men.

It is evident that the male and female are not equal in reality. Most of the western countries have laws that promote equality including equal pay laws and gender-neutral divorce although they do not show balance. In case there was real equality between the sexes, then men and women would be encouraged to choose any career path and they would not be judged for their choices. Currently, the men who want to do the feminine professions like nursing, human resource, and midwifery and the women who want to join the masculine careers including mechanics and engineering are discouraged and they are exposed to a lot of workplace sexism. This is a proof that there is no equality even in the 21st century. Furthermore, in a heterosexual relationship with the children, the men who stay at home with their kids are shamed and ridiculed for being whipped. On the other hand, the women who work are regarded as bad mothers. Most of the organizations also provide maternity leave but they do not offer paternity leave which is a show that there is no equality. Therefore, most of the countries have not achieved the issue of gender equality. The reason is that some nations legalize marital rape. Some countries especially the African countries also practice female genital mutilation. In some countries, the men are given the chance of marrying multiple while the women are not due to the chance of marrying multiple men. There is no equality.

Gender and leadership

Leadership refers to a relationship and process, which facilitates the human organization through exercising different forms of influence to the achievement of the shared goals (Reed, Vidaver-Cohen, & Colwell, 2011). On the other hand, Gender is the socially structured system that organizes a meaning. Therefore, these two systems are intertwined as their outcomes. Basing on this understanding, the leadership phenomenon and especially merit interpretation from the feminist perspective. Furthermore, the leadership theory has for long ignored the gender-related aspects of power even in the 21st century. The management has also failed to play the role of relating the new management tenets who advocate for involvement and nurturing the leadership styles to the changes in gender-linked values.

With increased gender portrayal in upper administration, women ought to encounter less obstacles for headway be that as it may be compared a lady's way to authority as navigating through a maze of surprising turns, deadlocks, barriers and disarray. Ely (1995) set that socially developed perspectives of female conduct were not compatible with initiative positions. Counter-gainful social developments have prompted negative relationship with female enterprise practices as ladies attempt to adjust practices seen to be more manly. For example, definitive, precise and persuaded with socially developed female practices like mindful, sympathetic and kind. Other scholars have shown practically no gender difference.

Social role hypothesis proposed that people would act as per assumptions about the parts that people possess. Completely, people, who can be ordered into characterized parts, will change practices in view of the standards of that part. Eagly (2005), contended that leaders have a tendency to all the while comply with the characterized parts both inside a hierarchical progressive system and inside societal sex parts. Gender roles elements allude to "shared desires that apply to people on the premise of their socially distinguished sexual orientation". Inside the setting of social part hypothesis, females have generally been considered to satisfy more steady and relational parts while men are viewed as more prone to meet practical areas. For example, the essential provider and arbitrator. Sexual orientation components have an understood indication in the usefulness of an association.

Research has shown that most people have suppositions that are one-sided by sexual orientation particular stereotypes. This implies certain practices are normal in light of the sexual orientation of pioneers and adherents. While this example of suspicions has been affirmed, the examination that would warrant these presumptions has created blended outcomes (Barbuto & Gifford, 2010). This has prompted a call for look into testing the mingled parts of sexual orientation particular practices, which prompted separations amongst agentic and collective sexual orientation part practices. Agentic practices allude to give-and-take inclinations. A person who shows agentic practices is probably going to be depicted as self-assured and would use assets as use for acquiring an objective. Agentic practices incorporate independence, freedom, prevailing, forceful and undertaking focused. Men will probably show agentic practices than their female partners.

Common practices allude to a worry with relational connections. A person who shows standard practices is probably going to be depicted as sympathetic and sustaining. Standard practices incorporate appearing sensitivity, socially arranged, accommodating and expressive. Eagly et al. (2005) found that women would probably show public practices than their male partners. Transformational administration alludes to the leader's capacity to improve devotees' execution past individual and the pioneer's desires. Transformational authority practices incorporate individualized thought, scholarly incitement, motivational inspiration, and glorified impact (Barbuto & Gifford, 2010). In the latest component examination of transformational administration practices, the glorified impact scale was separated into ascribed and conduct. These meta-comes about demonstrated that transformational initiative reliably prompted positive authoritative results. Value-based authority practices are described by the utilization of possibilities to strengthen attractive behavior. Transactional leadership practices incorporate uninvolved administration by exemption, dynamic management by particular case, and unexpected reward. This type of leadership includes behaviors like ignoring needs and problems, inability to recognize the followers, and the overall lack of responsibility for the management duties. Additionally, this type of leadership is regarded as the most passive and inefficient form of leadership.

Eagly et al. (2005) utilized social role theory as a hypothetical premise and conjectured that female leaders will probably be viewed as transformational leaders than men. The practices related to laissez-faire leadership and transactional leadership have particular linkages to the manly practices ordinarily related with agentic practices. According to Trinidad and Normore (2005), gender roles have overflow impacts into the act of authority inside associations. Female leaders scored inherently higher in the utilization of transformational administration practices and the contingent rewards. Furthermore, the male leaders showed altogether higher use of uninvolved management by particular case, dynamic administration by exemption and free enterprise administration. Interestingly with value-based initiative practices and free enterprise authority, transformational initiative practices have appeared to deliver additional exertion from adherents and also increment fulfillment with furthermore, saw viability of the leader. Eagly et al. (2005) analyzed these results crosswise over genders and announced female transformational leaders scored altogether higher on sustainability, additional exertion, and fulfillment scales. Taken together, impressive proof demonstrates that authority practices might be impacted by agentic and public flow.

Gender bias: reasons why the women are still held back

The financial contentions for gender equality are overpowering. However generalizations continue hindering advancement Women have never been in a more grounded position to lea...