The news about the death of Mrs. Mallards husband was delivered to her with great care owing to her heart condition. It was justified to ensure that great care was taken while informing her about the news or else, there would have been a tragedy. It was anticipated that careless revealing the death of her husband would have shocked her so terribly that it would have led to heart failure. However, this assumption is put into question after her perception of freedom blinded her. Furthermore, the shock of seeing her husband alive actually led to her death, and yet the earlier news seemed to have little effect on her. Despite the conclusion that the heart disease leading to her death was as a result of joy, it is clear that the shock emanated from the realization that her perceived freedom of the future would never happen. More so, before trudging on the imagined magical future of freedom, she should have taken time to mourn her husband.
Mrs. Mallards ill-conceived future freedom was short-lived because she did not properly ascertain the death of her husband and neither did she mourn him before looking forward to a long life full of freedom.
Mrs. Mallards short mourning instance was really inappropriate to the context. After the death of her husband, it is expected that she takes time to verify the news before planning out her future. It was also too negligent for her to mourn for her husband on one instance and seem to rejoice in the next moment. Wouldnt she wait to confirm his death and properly mourn him before praying for a long future life full of freedom?
As a young woman she was, she envisions the future freedom, and at that moment, everything else seems unimportant to her. Not even the fact that her husband was now dead and gone forever. Her self-assertion of freedom gripped her and derailed her from the life she was living at the moment. It is no wonder that seeing her husband was a shock of disbelief rather than a pool of joy. She couldnt fathom the long life ahead alongside her husband.
Mrs. Mallard died of a heart disease that resulted from the shock that she got after seeing her husband alive. After her mourning and imaginary stance, it seems she had already made up her mind of the ensuing life. It was thus a great shock to realize that her husband was actually alive. Although it was reckless to bring such news without substantial certainty, it was also untimely for her to shed of the thought of her husband being alive too fast.
Upon receiving the news of the death of her husband, Mrs. Mallard wept for a short while before being consumed into the fancy future she envisioned alone. She prayed for a long life with the presumption that she now had the freedom of body and mind. There is no doubt that she had taken in the news well and that she almost enjoyed the ultimate freedom when his husband showed at the door. Having been mistaken for dead, it was a shock seeing Mr. Mallard on the doorstep. It curtailed the dreams of her free future and also seeing the dead man alive again was too much for her feeble heart.
Mrs. Mallards ill-conceived future freedom was short-lived because she did not properly ascertain the death of her husband and neither did she mourn him before looking forward to a long live full of freedom.
Chopin, K. (2013). The story of an hour. Blackstone.
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the customtermpaperwriting.org website, please click below to request its removal: