Issues of International Policies - Paper Example

Published: 2021-08-15
1461 words
6 pages
13 min to read
Middlebury College
Type of paper: 
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Title of the Issue:Travel Bann.

The policy on the Bann of Citizens from seven Muslim countries namely; Iran, Syria, Libya, Somali, Yamen and Iraq from going into the United States

Detailed Explanation and Analysis:

During the presidents inauguration President Donald trump made many serious remarks on the need for more strict rules regarding how to handle jihadist militancy trends, the policy called for a such more strict or proactive policy in the fight against Sunni Jihadist militant groups. And in January 27th the president issues an executive order banning the citizens from the Muslim countries as seen in the introduction (Rose-Redwood 80).

This policy has brought about serious controversies since some of the countries have responded to this in different ways for instance the Irans official news agency, the Iran foreign ministry will result to similar counter measures as well where a ban of US nationals in the country as well as a counter attack of the US presidents Bann policy as well. Also in Iraq the government also called for a reciprocal measure as well for the ban of the US citizenship to the Islamic Republic. The Iraq popular mobilization Unit (PMU) called on the government of the country to ban the US nationals from entering the country as well as get those already in the country to leave the country immediately (Rose-Redwood). This brought about different reactions as seen and not only did those two countries respond but many other countries as well especially the Islamic countries had a response to this policy enactment.

Relate Issue to Texas:

From the review of the policy this was such a bold move by the president that would have needed more time and analysis before its implementation. Most of the countries saw this as a destruction of international relations being formed in the process by disconnecting the countries as well as bringing up religious differences. The State of Texas mainly remain silent on the travel ban by president trump (Rose-Redwood 103). From the different studies in relation to policies and there formation the travel ban was one of the most proactive measures towards the militancy trend but as seen earlier needed more time addressing.

RELATE TO: David Easton, or Harold Laswell, or Hans Morgenthau:

In this particular case, David Easton would argue that it is a total authoritative style of ruling that does not involve all stakeholders to make a policy. In the event that even the host citizens protested the policy, Trump would have realized that the policy is for no good since even American citizens have the right to move to other countries. The question that David Easton would have asked is what would happen if other countries also set up such policies. According to Easton, the power to control who enter a countrys territory is considered one of the essential characteristics of state independence, and states conventionally enjoy comprehensive pleasure in crafting the immigration guidelines. However, a federations power to control and contain immigration is controlled by human rights and refugee protection law. As such it is a bad move for a country which boasts of superiority to enact rules that stop innocent people from international movements.

2nd Issue

Title of the Issue:

Climate Change Policy Reversal.

Detailed Explanation and Analysis:

The President Donald trump signed the withdrawal from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which withdrew the efforts of the former president Obama that was aimed at handling global warming. The order reverses the clean power plan which required the United States to regulate the power plans a thing the president saw to be limiting the independence of the countrys energy sources also the president said to believe in human caused climatechanges and the reversal of this would lead to more jobs for the people (Starrs).

The environmental groups explained the possible harm of undoing the agreement and the impact on the changes would affect both the homes and even abroad not only the US. This led to an immediate impact where 17 states filled a legal challenge against this decision by the Trump administration to roll back the climate change regulations. These states were led by New York which argued that it was the responsibility of the administration to regulate the emission of harmful gases which are a major cause of global warming within the environment.

Relate to Texas:

From the analysis of the policy it does not add up to put the lives of all the citizens with the fact that a few jobs will be created but in return destroy the environment. Most of the states found it to be the responsibility of the administration to protect the environment and address the issue on global warming but not to be the major cause of this (Starrs 28). The state of Texas being among the 17 states against this policy did not want the policy being enacted and neither did they find the presidents way of thinking in relation to human involvement in climatically changes. Despite these policies affecting not only the country but other countries as well needs to be addressed cautiously as per the policy analysis forum.

RELATE TO: David Easton, or Harold Laswell, or Hans Morgenthau:

The environment concern especially the global change is not an issue for a particular country or state. This is because when one country is affected others are also impacted. The rate at of global destruction should not be compared to the number of jobs available and the independency of the country as these are the major arguments made by President Trump to withdraw the policy. It again affects the international relationship since America should be on the forefront in dealing with global warming. By intentionally signing the withdrawal from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the president has no good motive for his people.

3rd Issue

Title of Issue:

Undoing the Obama-Era Waterway Regulations

Detailed Explanation and Analysis:

President Trump signed theorder directing the EPA and the Army Corp of Engineers to reconsider a law passed by the former president Obama; this was the 2015 regulation which was known as the water of the US which gave authority to the federal government over small waterways which included small ponds, wetlands and headwaters. The Obama-era waterway regulations required a Clean Water Act permit for any developer who wished to change or interfere with the small water resources (Jervis 97).

The EPA is now tasked with rewriting the rule. The water protection laws were passed even before the passing of Obama rules by the congress. Some of these policies have brought about serious reactions from different states as well as the residents in the United States. This act alone brought to a series of reactions from different platforms in cry against the changes by the president.

Relate to the state of Texas: WITH IN-TEXT CITAION.

The clean water rule, accomplished by the Obama administration in 2015, was completed under the Clean Water Act of 1972. It provides the federal government with a broad authority to regulate pollution in chief bodies of water, such as Chesapeake Bay, Mississippi River and the Puget Sound, as well as in wetlands and streams that drain into the larger waters. Attempts to withdraw from this policy jeopardizes implementation of clean water act that was passed back in 1972. Texas is for the position that the issue in the matter is how and whether to update existing rules to protect the small and non-perennial brooks and streams as well as dangerous wetland. Headwater and irregularly-flowing streams sum up to more than half river miles in the mainland United States, while wetlands sieve polluted water, decrease the danger of flooding, and offer significant wildlife habitat.

RELATE TO: David Easton, or Harold Laswell, or Hans Morgenthau.

According to David Easton Political science is the study of the authoritative allocation of values for a society. Among valuable things to the society is food and shelter. 1972 Clean Water Act was implemented to ensure that all states and their citizens are able to get clean water, and several procedures are in this act to ensure water sources are not polluted. On the same note, the proposed regulation was to regionalize and decentralize management of water to the states which was proved be an easy way of providing clean water to all citizens. It is for this reason that there is no substantive evidence to withdraw from the proposed law since it aims to benefit the public.


Works Cited

Jervis, Robert. "Policy Series: President Trump and IR Theory." The International Security Studies Forum. Tilgjengeligpa https://issforum. org/roundtables/policy/1-5B-Jervis. Lesedato. Vol. 2. 2016.

Rose-Redwood, CindyAnn, and Reuben Rose-Redwood. "Rethinking the politics of the international student experience in the age of Trump." Journal of International Students 7.3 (2017): I.

Starrs, Ann M. "The Trump global gag rule: an attack on US family planning and global health aid." The Lancet 389.10068 (2017): 485-486.


Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the website, please click below to request its removal: