Essay Sample on Self-Image and Impressions Management

Published: 2021-06-29
902 words
4 pages
8 min to read
Sewanee University of the South
Type of paper: 
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Self-image is a concept that seeks to understand the perception of ones persona. It tries to envision the views of a personal and public perspective. In doing, this a person can attain their identity. Self-image goals are often adopted to increase other peoples perception of them, and it also boosts one's self-esteem when the perception is positive. Self-image might predict decreased self-esteem through decreased responsiveness to other people. As a person gets more comments on their hair and personality, they may decide to deem themselves or accept their image and what they ought to do (Ehrenberg, Juckes, White, & Walsh, 2008). People can also find themselves in situations where they are secluded from the world. This can be interpreted as them being socially awkward, introverted or even powerful. Self-image has a major influence on a one's character, personality, and attitude.

Compassionate goals, on the other hand, would rather reflect a genuine concern for other people through an increased responsiveness. People are comparatively diffident in how they present themselves to people close to them as associated to strangers. For other reasons, others seem to interpret peoples imprint management sometimes try otherwise. It, however, is dependent on the information they assume about different individuals. Self-image portrayed when one tries to use explicit measure present their best attributes as seen by both themselves and their immediate social group. In most instances, the public does not have information about ones actual qualities. It, therefore, is up to an individual to present themselves in the manner they would like to be perceived.

Social comparisons between others and the self are essential psychological tools for defining the behaviors, decisions and eventually experiences of individuals. These comparisons often dictate how they relate to the information they receive (Ehrenberg, Juckes, White, & Walsh, 2008). Unfortunately, when the same persons want to know how they are faring in comparison to other people, they do so by comparing their characteristics and setbacks to those of other people (Ehrenberg, Juckes, White, & Walsh, 2008). Social comparisons are dictated by misinformed persons talking about people they dont know personally.

Such comparisons are often fundamental, ubiquitous, and robust human proclivity. For long period social comparisons have been in a study of social psychology. The main articles of study have been the reason as to why people engage in social comparisons, who they engage with, and how social comparisons influence them (Kramer, & Winter, 2008). It is clear that people engage in social comparison for uniformity of opinion in a group that one associates with. The need to settle for social reality would also validate the correctness of one's individual sentiments and preferences.

Often, a person only gets one opportunity to make a first impression. When an individual gets on stage or appears in the presence of others, there is the reason for them to assemble their activity and give their best (Kramer, & Winter, 2008). The presentation is key and the confidence and charisma that is required from an individual seeking an audience. The halo effect is among the most common sought after competency in presentations of any kind. Proper organization and clarity of thought also count as important practices to have in such instances (Kramer, & Winter, 2008). The reputation a person builds first lasts in the minds of their audience. It, therefore, must come as an absolute competency to look presentable.

The 21st Century is the most information sensitive generation in the history of man. Information, therefore, is a critical concept and entity in modern day life. To perfectly influence an audience, the evidence of a persons character may be shared in limited light. By presenting the information that one wishes their audience to know, they can control their image. In directing the attention of the audience in one direction, the speaker inevitably makes a clearer messenger and delivers an objective speech.

Self-presentation is the attempt of a person to develop and influence their public image. Impression management involves more than gamesmanship at another level. More than management of behavior and maintaining appearances, it requires consistent self-examination. In dealing with issues in human social behavior, theoretical concepts come as an important competency. Impression management, for instance, is objective. The goal is to direct the attention of an audience, through selective honesty and positive reinforcement.

To help shape the agenda in the people to achieve desired results we tend to package information to help the audience to deduce the desired right conclusion. The packaging, in this case, is a pervasive feature of relational behavior. It should however not be perceived to be immoral despite the fact that it can be used purposefully for illicit ends (Kramer, & Winter, 2008). The clarity with which an individual communicates their agenda is an important competency in self-presentation and impression management. It allows the audience to relate to the message (Rosenfeld, 2010). In doing so, a person is able to preserve their self-defined image and reconcile the public opinion to theirs. Social inclusions, therefore, demand that a person manages their esteem and presents their intended agenda in the best manner possible.


Ehrenberg, A., Juckes, S., White, K., & Walsh, S. (2008). Personality and Self-Esteem as Predictors of Young People's Technology Use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 739-741.

Kramer, N., & Winter, S. (2008). Impression Management 2.0. Journal Of Media Psychology, 20(3), 106-116.

Rosenfeld, P. (2010). Self-Esteem and Impression Management Explanations for Self-Serving Biases. The Journal Of Social Psychology, 130(4), 495-500.

Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the website, please click below to request its removal: