The Great Britain and the colonies had several differences, particularly when it comes to the issue of colonial quartering Act of 1765 as well as 1774 that was meant secure the dependency of the colonial majesty's dominion, the crown, and the Great Britain Parliament (Morin 581). The colonies view the introduction of the Act as an attempt by the Great Britain to frustrate and disrespect them. Both Acts, (1765 and 1774) allowed the quartering of the troops was thereby inconveniencing the colonies since they were tasked with the economic and structural responsibilities. The colonies lived with the threat of troops being enforced to live with them in their private homes despite the Acts stipulating that the troops should live in public barracks. Some colonies resisted the Acts by the Great Britain which was then issued to punish them (Morgan 79). Therefore, the already bad relationship between the colonies and Great Britain escalated to another level.
The Colonist either born in American continent or other British dominions through the act of parliament, common law and law of God, as well as nature, are titled to all essential, natural as well as the inseparable rights and liberties of the fellow Great Britain subject. The rights include the following: the supreme, as well as subordinate powers resulting from the legislation, should sacred and free from the hands where they have been rightfully placed by the community.
# American perspective
The colonist had the right of being represented in the parliament or possessing a new subordinate. The colonists have the right of imposing taxes and laws upon the subject of its majesty to its colonies as well as the plantations. The colonists have the right as well as the authority make status and laws that have sufficient force as well as validity capable of binding the colonies. Additionally, the laws made by the colonist have the authority of subjecting the colonies to the subject of Great Britain Crown. The colonist subjected above colonies to bid by all the orders, resolutions and proceedings enacted by the Great Britain Parliament (Durivage 875). When the laws, as well as status and the power of colonists, are denied by the colonies or put into question by the colonies, the Great Britain has the authorities to declare such belief by the colonies as null and void in all manners whatsoever.
Due to the motherland sovereignty, the colonists had the right and indispensable duty to address the majesty and make humble application to both houses to obtain repeal late Acts that was restricting American commerce (Conser Jr 312). The colonists have the right to freely associate with people as well as the right of not to be imposed by taxed without their consent. The consent is either given personally or by their representative. Moreover, the colonists had the right to choose their representatives who constitutionally impose the tax on them. Additionally, the colonies have the inherent rights as well as the liberties of the natural born issue within the Great Britain Kingdom. Finally, the colonist had the right to impose to impose the tax impose the tax on her American Colonies as well as the authority of applying that right within the present conjuncture.
There was a good relationship between the Great Britain and the American colonies. The Great Britain gave a lot of freedom to the colonies, therefore; the American colonies were able to undertake their business without disturbance. Moreover, the Colonials were able to pass their grievances with the help of their representatives in the parliament thereby providing a platform for agreement between the colonies and the Great Britain. However, the imposing of tax and taking away the properties of the colonies without their consent lead to deterioration of the relationship.
Work Cited
Durivage, Justin, and Claire Priest. "The Stamp Act and the political origins of American legal and economic institutions." S. Cal. L. Rev. 88 (2014): 875.
Conser Jr, Walter H. "The United States: Reconsidering the Struggle for Independence, 17651775." Recovering Nonviolent History: Civil Resistance in Liberation Struggles (2013): 299-318.
Morin, Michel. "The Discovery and Assimilation of British Constitutional Law Principles in Quebec, 1764-1774." Dalhousie LJ 36 (2013): 581.
Morgan, Edmund S. Prologue to Revolution: Sources and Documents on the Stamp Act Crisis, 1764-1766. UNC Press Books (2012). 79
Request Removal
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the customtermpaperwriting.org website, please click below to request its removal:
