Articles Analysis Essay on Personality Disorder

According to Skodol et al., a comprehensive personality assessment is made up of, i. Types of disorders, stages of personality working, characters and domains, and the general criteria for PD. The authors argue that the four centers on categorizing personality psychopathology, by clinical expertise. In part ii, the authors present an empirical and theoretical rationale for each segment, illustrating with clinical application to demonstrate how the diagnoses concluded (Skodol 2011).

The study is important for the current research as it offers a different perspective on clinical and empirical rationales of personality assessments, considering the various degrees of specialties involved in personality psychopathology. Additionally, it opens up a separate study and further experimentation on pathological personality behaviors in line with the current research. Although the authors are silent on the clinical application of the personality traits and pathological personality types.

Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Personality in DSM5: Helping delineate personality disorder content and framing the meta structure. Journal of personality assessment, 93(4), 325-331.

Kruger et al., integrates dimensional character features into official nosology. The opportunity presented the authors with the challenging aspect of the integration. The authors help in analyzing how the model is important in creating a similar assessment instrument. The authors focus on the dimensional personality attribute model and a trait model that would assist in putting together the meta structure of Diagnostic and Statistical Model of Personality Disorders.

The content is relevant to the ongoing research as it presents models that are critical in assessing personality traits (Krueger 2011). The assessment of personality traits is essential for the understanding of arising issues in addressing dimensional personality actions. At the same time, the proposed roles in DSM-5 help in the current research as it outlines the similar assessment mechanisms used in delineating personality content disorders.

Bassett, D. (2012). Borderline personality disorder, and bipolar affective disorder. Spectra or spectre? A review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46(4), 327-339.

The author offers the differences and similarities that exist between borderline personality disorder and bipolar affective disorder on whether or how they relate and are different from each other. According to the findings, the two disorders differ from each other in the form of family history, sense of self, medication, cognitive deficits, mood cycling, psychotic episodes, and changes in cortical activity (Bassett 2012). The study found out several similarities on self-mutilation, depressive features, mitochondrion dysfunction, and prevalence of sleep disruption.

The article is relevant to the current research study as it offers an insight into specific character traits of personality disorder. While ignoring the comparison between the two personality disorders, the study helps analyze and break down specific features that identify and differentiate personality disorders from common personality complications or issues that may be attributed to stress or depressive disorders.

Beck, A. T., Davis, D. D., & Freeman, A. (2015). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. Guilford Publications.

Beck et al, provide an updated scientific compilation that touches on a variety of disorders. The authors describe each disease, describing strategies for diagnosis, implementation interventions, overcoming challenges to treatment, and case conceptualization. The book offers insight into clinical approaches to research, and the expansion of the disorder. Additionally, they discuss different reviews in assessing personality disorders while at the same time gives an overview of treatment strategies, clinical self-care, termination and progress (Beck 2015).

The book is critical and important to the current research study as it provides numerous definitive work of understanding, treating, and conceptualizing on cognitive behavior treatment. At the same time, the book will help organize, incorporate, and synthesize case conceptualization of personality disorders from different viewpoints.

References

Bassett, D. (2012). Borderline personality disorder, and bipolar affective disorder. Spectra or spectre? A review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46(4), 327-339.

Beck, A. T., Davis, D. D., & Freeman, A. (2015). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. Guilford Publications.

Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Personality in DSM5: Helping delineate personality disorder content and framing the meta structure. Journal of personality assessment, 93(4), 325-331.

Ritter, K., Dziobek, I., Preissler, S., Ruter, A., Vater, A., Fydrich, T., ... & Roepke, S. (2011). Lack of empathy in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 187(1), 241-247.

Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Oldham, J. M., Alarcon, R. D., ... & Siever, L. J. (2011). Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5. Journal of personality disorders, 25(2), 136-169.

Skodol, A. E., Clark, L. A., Bender, D. S., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., ... & Oldham, J. M. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: Description and rationale. Personality disorders: theory, research, and treatment, 2(1), 4.